\n<\/p>\n
WASHINGTON (AP) \u2014 The criminal indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center this week was met with much outrage but little surprise from civil rights leaders, who have for more than a year prepared for heightened legal scrutiny from the Trump administration, and how to mount a coordinated response.<\/p>\n
In rounds of calls immediately following the indictment, advocates discussed how to support the SPLC, a Montgomery, Alabama-based civil rights group founded in 1971 that has tracked white supremacist groups and been outspoken on voting rights, immigration and policing. Organizers on one call agreed that winning in the court of public opinion would be crucial as judicial proceedings began, leading to dozens of public statements of support and planned rallies.<\/p>\n
And legal advisors to civil rights groups urged organizers to prepare for similar criminal indictments, protracted legal action that may exhaust their resources and audits of their staff and internal documents.<\/p>\n
The flurry of behind-the-scenes coordination represented a marked mobilization by activist groups that, like many universities, law firms and non-profits, have been at odds with the federal government since President Donald Trump’s return to the White House last year.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s a muscle that has been built among these organizations learned from the law firm debacle,\u201d said Vanita Gupta, a former associate attorney general of the Justice Department during the Biden administration, referring to deals some major law firms made with the administration. Gupta led one of the calls that convened activists.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe government’s goal is often to shut down and paralyze an organization, so that their work has to stop while they defend themselves. And the hope here is that with this broad effort to defend the SPLC, that will not happen,\u201d said Gupta.<\/p>\n
Organizers say they are prepared to back the SPLC in its legal fight.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s a blatantly obvious attack on civil rights and civil liberties to whitewash the foot soldiers of the great replacement theory and other extremists. This coalition isn\u2019t going silent,\u201d said Maya Wiley, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, an umbrella organization of hundreds of civil rights groups.<\/p>\n
Without addressing the indictment, a coalition of more than 100 activist groups on Tuesday published a letter vowing solidarity with groups that are \u201cunjustly targeted\u201d by the federal government. SPLC was a signatory to the pact.<\/p>\n
\u201cAn attack on one is an attack on all,\u201d the coalition declared. \u201cWe will share knowledge, resources, and support with any organization threatened by abuses of power.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Justice Department alleges that the SPLC, which rose to prominence for its work prosecuting and tracking hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan, violated federal law through its network of paid informants in extremist groups. The DOJ claims the payments funded hate groups and misled the SPLC\u2019s donors.<\/p>\n
The SPLC now faces charges of wire fraud, bank fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering in the case brought in the federal court in Alabama, where the organization is based.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence,\u201d said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche at a press conference announcing the charges. Blanche promised the department \u201cwill hold the SPLC and every other fraudulent organization operating with the same deceptive playbook accountable.\u201d<\/p>\n
Longtime civil rights activists found the claims to be a disingenuous and partisan move that may empower extremist groups.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe indictment is nakedly political and represents the Justice Department turning on itself,\u201d said Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League. \u201cIt places the Justice Department in the posture of, in effect, defending white supremacist groups like the Ku Klux Klan and others.\u201d<\/p>\n
Advocates also view the indictment as part of the administration’s broader upending of civil rights law and the Justice Department’s prosecution of Trump’s political opponents.<\/p>\n
The SPLC in recent years became a bogeyman among conservatives who resented that the watchdog designated several rightwing organizations that engage in Republican politics as hateful or extremist.<\/p>\n
Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, which the SPLC has designated as a hate group, said the government should not only pursue convictions, but also restitution for those the SPLC has harmed.<\/p>\n
\u201cFor years, the SPLC has used its platform to label and target organizations with whom it disagrees, often blurring the line between legitimate concern and ideological attack,\u201d Perkins said in a statement. \u201cThat kind of reckless characterization doesn\u2019t just damage reputations, it has put lives at risk.\u201d<\/p>\n
In October, FBI Director Kash Patel cancelled the agency\u2019s longtime anti-extremism partnerships with the SPLC and the Anti-Defamation League, which combats antisemitism. Patel at the time called the SPLC a \u201cpartisan smear machine.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Justice Department and SPLC did not respond to requests for comment.<\/p>\n
Advocates dispute the DOJ’s characterization of the SPLC’s work.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe problem is that the indictment essentially claims that it was a fraud on SPLC\u2019s donors to use their funds to fight the Klan, the Neo Nazis and other white supremacist groups, when that is exactly why people gave to the organization,\u201d said Norm Eisen, founder of Democracy Defenders Action, a group that works with organizations in legal disputes with the Trump administration.<\/p>\n
Eisen added: \u201cThe notion that there\u2019s something wrong with using informants and protecting their identities to prevent white supremacist violence is belied by the fact that that is not only what the SPLC did, but it is also the stock and trade of the FBI itself.\u201d<\/p>\n
Civil rights organizations are now preparing for further legal action. Organizations have reviewed their document retention, tax compliance and auditing policies over the last year to safeguard against any probes or lawsuits.<\/p>\n
Some civil rights organizations have also floated creating new organizational structures that may better withstand legal scrutiny. On another recent call, activists floated restructuring some groups into for-profit entities, or potentially crafting new financial conduits for donors to ensure that staff could receive pay if an organization’s assets were seized or frozen.<\/p>\n
The preparations represent a marked shift for many civil rights leaders, who in recent years counted the Justice Department under both Democratic and Republican administrations as a reliable ally in key civil rights battles.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat we are seeing in real time is an administration seeking to leverage its position to target individuals and organizations that do not agree with its political thought,\u201d said NAACP President Derrick Johnson, who said the Justice Department has been \u201cweaponized by dangerous forces.”<\/p>\n
But for other leaders, the SPLC indictment raised the specter of a return to a previous era, when the Justice Department monitored civil rights leaders to disrupt their activities.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe’re not backing down, but we are clear-eyed. Everyone could be in some form of jeopardy if you’re in the crosshairs of this administration,\u201d said Juan Proa\u00f1o, CEO of the League of United Latin American Citizens, a civil rights group suing the Trump administration over executive orders addressing birthright citizenship and mail-in voting.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat’s what they\u2019re looking for; they want this to have a chilling effect,” Proa\u00f1o said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n