Welcome back to TechCrunch Mobility<\/strong> \u2014 your central hub for news and insights on the future of transportation. To get this in your inbox, sign up here for free \u2014 just click TechCrunch Mobility!<\/em><\/p>\n We\u2019re going to do a bit of a deep dive today, which may make this newsletter look a little different than normal. There is a reason!\u00a0<\/p>\n This newsletter is not region-specific, but sometimes there are policies at the state level that have widespread implications for tech companies and startups alike. Which brings me to California and the new autonomous vehicle testing and deployment rules issued this week by the state\u2019s Department of Motor Vehicles.\u00a0<\/p>\n There are two new sets of rules \u2014 collectively 100 pages long \u2014 that cover requirements for the testing and deployment of AVs. I spent the past few days speaking to engineers and policy folks working at AV companies and discovered that they have strong opinions and<\/em> few want to speak publicly about it. But thanks to the public commentary period on these regulations, we have some insight into what the industry supported and what it did not.\u00a0<\/p>\n The regulations include new, more robust requirements for data collection and sharing, training, and operations. Here are a few items that stuck out and what insiders told me.<\/p>\n How do you ticket a robotaxi?<\/strong> Under these new rules, law enforcement can cite AV companies for traffic violations committed by their vehicles. The rule, called \u201cNotice of Autonomous Vehicle Noncompliance,\u201d requires the manufacturer (meaning the robotaxi company) to report the violation to the DMV within 72 hours of receiving it from law enforcement.\u00a0<\/p>\n I\u2019ve heard a number of interpretations of this rule and how it will be implemented, but it appears there is not a monetary fine attached to these violations. Instead, these violations are another piece of data that the DMV can use to identify problems and take action if needed.<\/p>\n Techcrunch event<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSan Francisco, CA<\/span> Insiders told me that the data is actionable and more important than a monetary fine. My question: Why not both?\u00a0<\/p>\n The good news for industry<\/strong>:<\/strong> The DMV will now allow heavy-duty vehicles equipped with autonomous vehicle tech to test and eventually deploy on public roads. Self-driving truck companies are happy with this outcome. Daniel Goff<\/strong>, VP of external affairs at Kodiak<\/strong>, told me the company is already working on the required documentation to apply for a permit.\u00a0<\/p>\n The burden for the industry<\/strong>:<\/strong> The word that came up in every conversation I had with someone in the AV industry was \u201cburdensome.\u201d And it was always used in reaction to the new data collection and sharing regulations.\u00a0<\/p>\n Goodbye, disengagement reports; hello, malfunctions<\/strong>:<\/strong> Others were happy to see annual disengagement reporting disappear. Disengagement reports, which detailed instances when human drivers had to take over control due to technology failures or safety concerns, have been controversial because companies use varying standards. This has made it impossible to compare the results or rate the proficiency of autonomous vehicle technology.\u00a0<\/p>\n That entire section has been removed and replaced with a requirement to report \u201cdynamic driving task performance relevant system failure.\u201d This may seem like semantics \u2014 trading one jargony phrase for another. Insiders tell me that while it is not a perfect metric, it is clearer than its predecessor. That doesn\u2019t mean it is beloved either.\u00a0<\/p>\n There is a lot more in these documents, including a requirement to provide annual updates to first responder interaction plans, access to manual vehicle override systems, two-way communication links with 30-second response times, and updated training requirements to ensure safe and timely interactions with first responders.<\/p>\n My question for you, reader, is whether these rules go too far or if they are appropriate and provide the kind of reporting and data collection needed to keep these companies accountable? Sign up for the Mobility newsletter to vote in our polls!<\/p>\n We had a lot of little birds talk to us about the new California AV rules, so nothing new to add here. But remember, you can always send us tips. Here\u2019s how.<\/p>\n BMW i Ventures<\/strong> launched a new $300 million fund with a timely thesis: AI will reshape how the automotive industry operates. The fund will invest in early-stage through Series B startups in North America and Europe that are working on agentic AI and physical AI as well as industrial software, advanced materials, and manufacturing and supply-chain technologies. This third fund brings the firm\u2019s total capital under management to $1.1 billion.\u00a0<\/p>\n Other deals that got my attention \u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n Sereact<\/strong>, a German robotics startup, raised $110 million in a Series B funding round led by VC Headline. Other investors include Bullhound Capital, Felix Capital, Daphni, Air Street Capital, Creandum, and Point Nine.<\/p>\n Spirit Airlines<\/strong> is preparing to shut down after failing to secure a $500 million lifeline from the government, the WSJ reports. The company is expected to cease operations around 3 a.m. ET Saturday.<\/p>\n China<\/strong> suspended issuing new licenses for autonomous vehicles after dozens of Baidu\u2019s Apollo Go robotaxis suddenly stopped last month, Bloomberg reported.<\/p>\n Google<\/strong>\u2018s Gemini AI assistant is hitting the road in millions of vehicles.<\/p>\n Faraday Future<\/strong> paid around $7.5 million to a company controlled by its founder, Jia Yueting, in 2025, senior reporter Sean O\u2019Kane discovered in a recent SEC filing.\u00a0<\/p>\n Rivian<\/strong> reported earnings this week and one item that stood out to us \u2014 and to many others \u2014 was the downsizing of its DOE loan from $6.6 billion to $4.5 billion. That loan restructuring comes with changes to its Georgia factory. Instead of two 200,000-vehicle capacity structures on the Georgia site, Rivian will now build a 300,000-vehicle capacity factory and leave the adjacent \u201cpad\u201d untouched and ready for future development. Analysts didn\u2019t necessarily view this as negative but did position this as rightsizing. Barclays<\/strong>, for instance, views the modification as Rivian adjusting to the current EV environment, according to a research note published Friday. Barclays also stated it didn\u2019t believe Rivian currently plans to build the second plant at Georgia, \u201cat least not until early\/mid next decade.\u201d<\/p>\n Tesla<\/strong> launched a Semi-Charging for Business program, which includes a new product called the Basecharger that is designed for depot and overnight use.<\/p>\n Uber<\/strong> has tapped Hertz<\/strong> to clean, charge, and fix its Lucid Motors<\/strong> robotaxis. This announcement left us with a cheeky question: How many companies does it take to launch a robotaxi service?<\/p>\n Uber<\/strong> customers in the United States can now book hotels directly through the app, one of several new features announced this week that pushes far beyond the company\u2019s original ride-hailing purpose and even deeper into its users\u2019 lives. At launch, Uber customers will have access to more than 700,000 hotels worldwide through a partnership with Expedia Group, the travel company that Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi led for 12 years.<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t|<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tOctober 13-15, 2026<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\nA little bird<\/h2>\n
![\"blinky](\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/blinky-cat-bird-green.gif?w=680\")
Deals!<\/h2>\n
![\"money](\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/money-the-station.png?w=680\")
Notable reads and other tidbits<\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/the-station-ride-hailing1.png?w=680\")