Transplant referral odds may be lower for adults in Southeast with Medicare Advantage


Key takeaways:

  • Patients with Medicare Advantage had lower odds of receiving kidney transplant referral vs. Traditional Medicare.
  • No significant differences were observed for evaluation and wait-listing rates after adjustment.

NEW ORLEANS — Patients with Medicare Advantage plans may have lower odds of receiving a kidney transplant referral than patients with traditional Medicare, data presented at the National Kidney Foundation Spring Clinical Meetings show.

More than 50% of Medicare-eligible patients receiving dialysis are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans as of 2024, according to Adam S. Wilk, PhD, associate professor of surgery at Indiana University School of Medicine, and colleagues. The researchers aimed to assess whether Medicare Advantage plans, compared with traditional Medicare, may help or hinder access to transplant among the dialysis population in three states in the Southeast: Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina.



Graphic distinguishing meeting news



Wilk_Adam_2026_80x106

Adam S. Wilk

“Because so much about the business practices of Medicare Advantage plans are considered proprietary information, we do not have much systematically collected information on how its prior authorization requirements and networks interface with patients’ transplant care pathways,” Wilk told Healio. ”Anecdotal information from some transplant centers, nephrologists, social workers and patients indicates these tools of managed care may play a few different roles.”

The researchers assessed early transplant outcomes among 56,775 patients (mean age, 60.4 years; 43.8% women; 53.5% Black) on dialysis from the United States Renal Data System from 2015 to 2021. They evaluated associations between insurance type and transplant referrals within 1 year of starting dialysis, transplant evaluation within 6 months of referral and wait-listing within 1 year of evaluation start through the Early Steps to Transplant Access Registry for the Southeast.

Results showed 22,007 adults received a transplant referral and 11,256 started the evaluation process.

Patients with Medicare Advantage plans had significantly lower odds of receiving a transplant referral (subdistribution HR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.97) vs. those with traditional Medicare. No significant differences were observed between Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare regarding transplant evaluation starts or wait-listing when adjusting for patient and community-level differences, according to the researchers.

Additionally, subgroup analysis revealed patients younger than 65 years with Medicare Advantage had lower referral odds vs. those with traditional Medicare, according to the researchers.

The findings suggest patients with Medicare Advantage plans may be less likely to receive a transplant referral, according to the researchers.

Based on anecdotal information, Wilk said, prior authorization requirements and Medicare Advantage plans’ hospital and physician networks may be a factor in the lower transplant referral rates.

“These paperwork efforts are generally considered burdensome by patients and care teams, and Medicare Advantage plans have some track record of denying prior authorization requests even when they shouldn’t, as observed in some reports from the Office of Inspector General of HHS,” Wilk said. “Then, if hospital or physician networks make it more challenging to find a transplant center or specialist in network, patients will be less likely to complete the transplant evaluation.”

Wilk said some challenges posed by Medicare Advantage plans may be partly “offset” by some of its benefits.

“Medicare Advantage’s out-of-pocket maximums, reduced out-of-pocket spending for services like prescription drugs and other benefits like dental care could lead to some better transplant outcomes,” Wilk said. “These plans may also focus more narrowly on ‘higher-quality’ hospitals and physicians, though their definition of ‘quality’ is not transparent to us.”

Overall, clinicians should be able to inform patients interested in transplant about the potential benefits and barriers based on their insurance plan, Wilk said.

Furthermore, Wilk said future research on Medicare Advantage plans may need federal policy involvement to receive more transparent plan information and assess patient outcomes.

“If research can show that Medicare Advantage plan networks of transplant hospitals are deterring patients from pursuing transplant at all, then it may be appropriate for federal regulators to institute network adequacy requirements to ensure enrollees have adequate access to transplant hospitals,” he said. “It may also be necessary for policymakers to mandate that Medicare Advantage plans disclose network information or prior authorization requirements publicly and institute auditing procedures to ensure that information disclosed is accurate.”

For more information:

Adam S. Wilk, PhD, can be reached at aswilk@iu.edu or on LinkedIn.



<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *